Summary
"Atlas shrugged his Ayn Rand" is a popular book since 1957. And it has always been recognized that it would be a beast film adaptation because it is a novel by page 1200 with deeply philosophical bent. Many spoke and proposed this project over the years, and now we finally have a success. The film was made, but it illustrates perfectly what a beast, the process was.
(Note: this 1200 pages is still more work that it sounds like today.) This has been done before even electric typewriter was common, much less text processing. By comparison, novel 1984 by George Orwell is 376 pages).
This film is very different, and if you need a structure of conventional Hollywood history at ease with your move view, this will be an uncomfortable film. I found myself waiting for things to happen, such as violence, which has never been.
Details
Do a quick summary of the book Atlas Shrugged his would be a bad service, but not in the film. It's history of Dagny Taggart, a young businesswoman, ambitious, as she tries to save the company of his family from the incompetent both sea railway his own business and Government and competition in his company. Help is Henry Reardon, another competent company that runs a steel company. He returned with a hot new alloy - Reardon Metal - which will record Dagny company making rail work better railway road, and after that, it will revolutionize the world.
As they save the day, they brush against a mystery: some other competent people around them are disappearing. Do not disappear of mystery-thriller-style typical - there is no Mafia or the murderers and abductors - they are simply leave their job and then completely drop out of the landscape. This disappearance is not at the Centre of this film, part I, but it is Foreshadowing what will happen in the second part.
One of the features of this film: it violates several conventional Hollywood history structures. That said, let's get in the review of the Technofiction:
o the first notable thing about this film is the story. It is presented as a thriller, but there is no violence. People walk through the streets dark lonely... and they are not sautéed. The wicked are get frustrated... but they do not call in the rogue. There are profound social unrest... but we do not see riots. A mysterious stranger knocks on a door towards the end of a night... and the door is to respond without disaster befalling the "answerer". We see a new line of railway with a new train speeding along it... and person sabotages it.
It's disturbing to look at, but this is what makes it a different story. I liked that.
o the second notable thing is that it is anachronistic - landscape and socializing are at the time. This film is described as taking place in 2016, but there are many public servants and little cell phones. The Director seemed to produce a social sense of the 1950s, not a future sense close.
o linked to the above, I do not feel that Dagny and Henry were working. They talked about much, we have given many of them in offices, but not as I watched the competent people, doing me business. Neither one seemed quite practical, problem of problems enough... it is difficult to describe, but they earn my respect for the company. Other hand, the incompetent surrounding seemed them well to make their incompetence.
o this film really need a beginning of mood. The departure is a series of bulletins of new talk of recession and crisis that is noticeable in America as the film opens in 2016, but it is quick and summary. Yeah, it would cut time Dagny-Reardon, but it takes more, Show me, Don ' t tell me "with regard to the economic hole deep America was in, and what was causing the frustration." The story would have been stronger if it was clearer than the Dagny environment and Henry responded to the.
o in the happy end, the train traffic on the metal rails new Reardon sets a North American speed record.
EH? Just replace the rail allows a train to run faster? What signage, curve drawings, drawings of locomotives and cars and Government regulations and speed limits? They have no influence?
In sum, the highlight of the film is that it is indicative of a different story. It is also because it uses the story of thriller format, but taking all threats of violence as it does. This is a movie strange feeling indeed.
And it is also its weakness. If you need a familiar story telling format when you watch a movie, it will be uncomfortable sitting around.
No comments:
Post a Comment